THE ADVENT OF A NEW AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS COLD CLIMATE ERA WHICH HAS BEEN IN THE MAKING FOR SOMETIME, ESSENTIALLY ELIMINATES THE GLOBAL WARMING THEORY AS AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR UNDERSTANDING GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE. JOHN CASEY 2011
So They Want To Tell Us We Just Had the Hottest Year?
Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues!
The global warming establishment and the media are crowing about 2010 being in a tie for the “hottest year” ever. The UK Guardian headline sums up the media’s promotion:
UK Guardian: ‘Hottest Year’ Claim: 2014 officially the ‘hottest year’ on record US government scientists say - ‘Nasa and Noaa scientists report 2014 was 0.07F (0.04C) higher than previous records…The global average temperatures over land and sea surface for the year was 1.24F (0.69C) above the 20th century average, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) and Nasa reported. The scientists said 2014 was 0.07F (0.04C) higher than the previous records set in 2005 and 2010.’
But scientists and climate skeptics are countering that the claims of “hottest year” are based on immeasurable temperature differences that are based on hundredths of a degree differences.
Climate Depot’s Marc Morano issued this statement: “There are dueling global datasets — surface temperature records and satellite records — and they disagree. The satellites show an 18 year plus global warming ‘standstill and the satellite was set up to be “more accurate” than the surface records. See: Flashback: 1990 NASA Report: ‘Satellite analysis of upper atmosphere is more accurate, & should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temp change.’ READ MORE
The global warming establishment and the media are crowing about 2010 being in a tie for the “hottest year” ever. The UK Guardian headline sums up the media’s promotion:
UK Guardian: ‘Hottest Year’ Claim: 2014 officially the ‘hottest year’ on record US government scientists say - ‘Nasa and Noaa scientists report 2014 was 0.07F (0.04C) higher than previous records…The global average temperatures over land and sea surface for the year was 1.24F (0.69C) above the 20th century average, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) and Nasa reported. The scientists said 2014 was 0.07F (0.04C) higher than the previous records set in 2005 and 2010.’
But scientists and climate skeptics are countering that the claims of “hottest year” are based on immeasurable temperature differences that are based on hundredths of a degree differences.
Climate Depot’s Marc Morano issued this statement: “There are dueling global datasets — surface temperature records and satellite records — and they disagree. The satellites show an 18 year plus global warming ‘standstill and the satellite was set up to be “more accurate” than the surface records. See: Flashback: 1990 NASA Report: ‘Satellite analysis of upper atmosphere is more accurate, & should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temp change.’ READ MORE
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism By James Taylor | Forbes – Wed, Jul 27, 2011
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models. "The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans." In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted. These new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate. Scientists on all sides of the global warming debate are in general agreement about how much heat is being directly trapped by human emissions of carbon dioxide (the answer is "not much"). However, the single most important issue in the global warming debate is whether carbon dioxide emissions will indirectly trap far more heat by causing large increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds. Alarmist computer models assume human carbon dioxide emissions indirectly cause substantial increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds (each of which are very effective at trapping heat), but real-world data have long shown that carbon dioxide emissions are not causing as much atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds as the alarmist computer models have predicted. When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are. Lies and more lies from our government & the United Nations! |
Global Warming Activism and Christianity
In the latest iteration of the mainstream media fawning over left wing activists disguised as conservative or mainstream Christian leaders, the WashingtonPost had published a bizarre Op-ed by Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, identifying herself as the past president of the Chicago Theological Seminary, saying it is “morally evil” for skeptics to disagree with her on global warming. For people of faith who may take a quick glance at Thistlethwaite’s asserted credentials and assume that she speaks for conservative or mainstream Christians and a Biblical point of view, beware of Thistlethwaite in sheep’s clothing. MORE
Thistlethwaite is a Professor of Theology at Chicago Theological Seminary so that should show you which side of the road she drives on. |
CONTINUED LIES & DECEPTION with BILL GATES PAYING THE BILLS!
Climate Hacking: A Look at Deliberate Man-Made Change By Susanne Posel, Jan 6, 2015
Geoengineering, or affectionately called climate hacking has loomed as an option for scientists who want to combat the effects of global warming by “deliberately tampering with [the planet’s] climate” as a more “direct intervention” to our atmosphere, seas and oceans.
Those in favor of climate hacking say this “might buy us time to prevent warming above 2C, and that we should look at it seriously in case everything goes pear-shaped with our climate.”
One method of geoengineering being used is solar radiation management (SRM).
Several scientists are being funded by Bill Gates to implement various cooling methods into the atmosphere.
David Keith of the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada, and Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution are collaborating with experts in the field of energy, economists and policymarkers to present detailed information regarding the technical and intellectual properties of using chemicals to cool the temperature of the planet.
Gates has become the biggest private sector funder of geoengineering projects.
To Gates, geoengineering will “buy us time” to deal with the problems at hand. For now, Gates is willing to sacrifice the structure of our biosphere in order to push his ideas for green electricity generation and transportation.
However, 5 years ago the UN Convention on Biological Diversity asserted that experiments on the earth’s weather patterns must be halted until more research can be conducted to confirm their positive effects.
Scientists in the UK, Netherlands and Germany say that there is no consensus on climate change within the scientific community.
That the theory greenhouse gases cause global warming is a just that – a theory.
Furthermore, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said there is no accord on how the phenomenon of climate hacking and changing global temperature would affect extreme weather that is currently being created.
These respected scientists said: “The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have been reported to be losing mass at accelerating rates. However, at present there is no scientific consensus on whether these reported accelerations result from variability inherent to the ice-sheet-climate system, or reflect long-term changes.”
Geoengineering, or affectionately called climate hacking has loomed as an option for scientists who want to combat the effects of global warming by “deliberately tampering with [the planet’s] climate” as a more “direct intervention” to our atmosphere, seas and oceans.
Those in favor of climate hacking say this “might buy us time to prevent warming above 2C, and that we should look at it seriously in case everything goes pear-shaped with our climate.”
One method of geoengineering being used is solar radiation management (SRM).
Several scientists are being funded by Bill Gates to implement various cooling methods into the atmosphere.
David Keith of the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada, and Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution are collaborating with experts in the field of energy, economists and policymarkers to present detailed information regarding the technical and intellectual properties of using chemicals to cool the temperature of the planet.
Gates has become the biggest private sector funder of geoengineering projects.
To Gates, geoengineering will “buy us time” to deal with the problems at hand. For now, Gates is willing to sacrifice the structure of our biosphere in order to push his ideas for green electricity generation and transportation.
However, 5 years ago the UN Convention on Biological Diversity asserted that experiments on the earth’s weather patterns must be halted until more research can be conducted to confirm their positive effects.
Scientists in the UK, Netherlands and Germany say that there is no consensus on climate change within the scientific community.
That the theory greenhouse gases cause global warming is a just that – a theory.
Furthermore, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said there is no accord on how the phenomenon of climate hacking and changing global temperature would affect extreme weather that is currently being created.
These respected scientists said: “The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have been reported to be losing mass at accelerating rates. However, at present there is no scientific consensus on whether these reported accelerations result from variability inherent to the ice-sheet-climate system, or reflect long-term changes.”
WARNING GLOBAL COOLING!
The Global Climate Status Report (GCSR) for Dec 10, 2014, Edition 3-2014, is now available!
The SSRC continues to provide the only US-produced independent, authoritative, non-governmental, semi-annual, global climate report. It is intended for government officials, educators, business and financial leaders, insurers and risk managers, agriculture experts, farmers, ranchers, commodity traders, media and weather experts, the environmental community and the average citizen who wants an unbiased, apolitical understanding of the Earth's climate and where it is going.
The GCSR gives all the essential climate status information in plain text and clearly explained charts. This gives one a quick yet comprehensive enough understanding of the Earth's climate status in order to converse with anyone on climate change from a factual basis. The GCSR provides the individual status for each of the 24 climate parameters monitored by the Space and Science Research Corporation and tells whether they are in a WARMING, COOLING or NEUTRAL trend. The GCSR uses the latest satellite and ground based scientific data from the primary climate monitoring organizations around the world and also contains interesting articles and/or commentaries from leading climate researchers, geologists, solar physicists and other experts, but written in a form for anyone to grasp.
We live in a time when the United Nations and our own US government routinely misleads us about the real causes and effects of climate change. The GCSR is the indispensable tool to have at your side when having a simple conversation with friends, making vital global business decisions, talking to government leaders about sea level rise or calling your utility company when they want to raise your rates because of CO2 emissions. Now you can have at your disposal all you may need to understand and discuss the truth about the Earth's climate status - the Global Climate Status Report.
Don't be caught discussing the climate without the critical facts available to you in the Global Climate Status Report, especially the long range climate prediction for the next thirty years.
The GCSR is comprehensive, current, and is from a leading climate research organization with one of the best track records for successful major climate predictions in the US. If you did not know that global warming ended years ago, that the Earth's oceans and atmosphere have been cooling for most of the past eleven years, that global sea levels are about to drop steeply for decades, that mankind's CO2 emissions have little or no significant impact on climate change or that a potentially dangerous new cold climate epoch has already started - then you need the Global Climate Status Report - NOW! READ MORE
The SSRC continues to provide the only US-produced independent, authoritative, non-governmental, semi-annual, global climate report. It is intended for government officials, educators, business and financial leaders, insurers and risk managers, agriculture experts, farmers, ranchers, commodity traders, media and weather experts, the environmental community and the average citizen who wants an unbiased, apolitical understanding of the Earth's climate and where it is going.
The GCSR gives all the essential climate status information in plain text and clearly explained charts. This gives one a quick yet comprehensive enough understanding of the Earth's climate status in order to converse with anyone on climate change from a factual basis. The GCSR provides the individual status for each of the 24 climate parameters monitored by the Space and Science Research Corporation and tells whether they are in a WARMING, COOLING or NEUTRAL trend. The GCSR uses the latest satellite and ground based scientific data from the primary climate monitoring organizations around the world and also contains interesting articles and/or commentaries from leading climate researchers, geologists, solar physicists and other experts, but written in a form for anyone to grasp.
We live in a time when the United Nations and our own US government routinely misleads us about the real causes and effects of climate change. The GCSR is the indispensable tool to have at your side when having a simple conversation with friends, making vital global business decisions, talking to government leaders about sea level rise or calling your utility company when they want to raise your rates because of CO2 emissions. Now you can have at your disposal all you may need to understand and discuss the truth about the Earth's climate status - the Global Climate Status Report.
Don't be caught discussing the climate without the critical facts available to you in the Global Climate Status Report, especially the long range climate prediction for the next thirty years.
The GCSR is comprehensive, current, and is from a leading climate research organization with one of the best track records for successful major climate predictions in the US. If you did not know that global warming ended years ago, that the Earth's oceans and atmosphere have been cooling for most of the past eleven years, that global sea levels are about to drop steeply for decades, that mankind's CO2 emissions have little or no significant impact on climate change or that a potentially dangerous new cold climate epoch has already started - then you need the Global Climate Status Report - NOW! READ MORE
CLIMATE CHANGE CON ARTISTS
|
|
|
Historic Global Temperature Drop Predicted
Thursday, November 20, 2014 Press Release 4-2014
3:00 PM
The Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC) announces today an important set of climate change predictions dealing with the coming cold climate epoch that will dominate global temperatures for the next thirty years.
According to analysis of the most reliable solar activity trends and climate models based on the Relational Cycle Theory (RC Theory), the SSRC concludes the following:
1. The Earth is about to begin a steep drop in global temperatures off its present global temperature plateau. This plateau has been caused by the absence of growth in global temperatures for 18 years, the start of global cooling in the atmosphere and the oceans, and the end of a short period of moderate solar heating from an unusually active secondary peak in solar cycle #24.
2. Average global atmospheric and oceanic temperatures will drop significantly beginning between 2015 and 2016 and will continue with only temporary reversals until they stabilize during a long cold temperature base lasting most of the 2030's and 2040's. The bottom of the next global cold climate caused by a "solar hibernation" (a pronounced reduction in warming energy coming from the Sun) is expected to be reached by the year 2031.
3. The predicted temperature decline will continue for the next fifteen years and will likely be the steepest ever recorded in human history, discounting past short-duration volcanic events.
4. Global average temperatures during the 2030's will reach a level of at least 1.5° C lower than the peak temperature year of the past 100 years established in 1998. The temperatures during the 2030's will correspond roughly to that observed from 1793 to 1830, shortly after the founding of the United States of America. This average lower global temperature of 1.5° C on average, translates to declines in temperatures that will be devastating for crop growing regions in the mid latitudes of the planet.
(Download the complete Press Release with comments from other experts on the link below)
Click Here to Download a PDF File of this Press Release
3:00 PM
The Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC) announces today an important set of climate change predictions dealing with the coming cold climate epoch that will dominate global temperatures for the next thirty years.
According to analysis of the most reliable solar activity trends and climate models based on the Relational Cycle Theory (RC Theory), the SSRC concludes the following:
1. The Earth is about to begin a steep drop in global temperatures off its present global temperature plateau. This plateau has been caused by the absence of growth in global temperatures for 18 years, the start of global cooling in the atmosphere and the oceans, and the end of a short period of moderate solar heating from an unusually active secondary peak in solar cycle #24.
2. Average global atmospheric and oceanic temperatures will drop significantly beginning between 2015 and 2016 and will continue with only temporary reversals until they stabilize during a long cold temperature base lasting most of the 2030's and 2040's. The bottom of the next global cold climate caused by a "solar hibernation" (a pronounced reduction in warming energy coming from the Sun) is expected to be reached by the year 2031.
3. The predicted temperature decline will continue for the next fifteen years and will likely be the steepest ever recorded in human history, discounting past short-duration volcanic events.
4. Global average temperatures during the 2030's will reach a level of at least 1.5° C lower than the peak temperature year of the past 100 years established in 1998. The temperatures during the 2030's will correspond roughly to that observed from 1793 to 1830, shortly after the founding of the United States of America. This average lower global temperature of 1.5° C on average, translates to declines in temperatures that will be devastating for crop growing regions in the mid latitudes of the planet.
(Download the complete Press Release with comments from other experts on the link below)
Click Here to Download a PDF File of this Press Release
ALWAYS FOLLOW THE MONEY AND DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!
Feb 2, 2013 Global warming alarmists are attacking the integrity of scientists, desperately seeking to minimize the damage presented by a recent survey of geo-scientists and engineers regarding global warming.
A recent survey of more than 1,000 geo-scientists (commonly known as earth scientists) and engineers reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studiesfound that only 36 percent agree with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assertion that humans are causing a serious global warming problem. By contrast, a majority of scientists in the survey believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
Feb 2, 2013 Global warming alarmists are attacking the integrity of scientists, desperately seeking to minimize the damage presented by a recent survey of geo-scientists and engineers regarding global warming.
A recent survey of more than 1,000 geo-scientists (commonly known as earth scientists) and engineers reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studiesfound that only 36 percent agree with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assertion that humans are causing a serious global warming problem. By contrast, a majority of scientists in the survey believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
SOUNDS LIKE SCIENCE FICTION...OR SOME CONSPIRACY THEORY...BUT IT ISN'T.
Have you wondered where these terms 'sustainability' and 'smart growth' and 'high density urban mixed use development' came from? Doesn't it seem like about 10 years ago you'd never heard of them and now everything seems to include these concepts? Is that just a coincidence? That every town and county and state and nation in the world would be changing their land use/planning codes and government policies to align themselves with...what?
Have you wondered where these terms 'sustainability' and 'smart growth' and 'high density urban mixed use development' came from? Doesn't it seem like about 10 years ago you'd never heard of them and now everything seems to include these concepts? Is that just a coincidence? That every town and county and state and nation in the world would be changing their land use/planning codes and government policies to align themselves with...what?
1974 - 1977 -Sunspot Cycle. The changing weather is apparently connected with differences in the amount of energy that the earth's surface receives from the sun. Changes in the earth's tilt and distance from the sun could, for instance, significantly increase or decrease the amount of solar radiation falling on either hemisphere—thereby altering the earth's climate. Some observers have tried to connect the eleven-year sunspot cycle with climate patterns, but have so far been unable to provide a satisfactory explanation of how the cycle might be involved.
Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend. The University of Wisconsin's Reid A. Bryson and other climatologists suggest that dust and other particles released into the atmosphere as a result of farming and fuel burning may be blocking more and more sunlight from reaching and heating the surface of the earth.
Climatic Balance. Some scientists like Donald Oilman, chief of the National Weather Service's long-range-prediction group, think that the cooling trend may be only temporary. But all agree that vastly more information is needed about the major influences on the earth's climate. Indeed, it is to gain such knowledge that 38 ships and 13 aircraft, carrying scientists from almost 70 nations, are now assembling in the Atlantic and elsewhere for a massive 100-day study of the effects of the tropical seas and atmosphere on worldwide weather. The study itself is only part of an international scientific effort known acronymically as GARP (for Global Atmospheric Research Program).
Whatever the cause of the cooling trend, its effects could be extremely serious, if not catastrophic. Scientists figure that only a 1% decrease in the amount of sunlight hitting the earth's surface could tip the climatic balance, and cool the planet enough to send it sliding down the road to another ice age within only a few hundred years.
The earth's current climate is something of an anomaly; in the past 700,000 years, there have been at least seven major episodes of glaciers spreading over much of the planet. Temperatures have been as high as they are now only about 5% of the time. But there is a peril more immediate than the prospect of another ice age. Even if temperature and rainfall patterns change only slightly in the near future in one or more of the three major grain-exporting countries—the U.S., Canada and Australia —global food stores would be sharply reduced. University of Toronto Climatologist Kenneth Hare, a former president of the Royal Meteorological Society, believes that the continuing drought and the recent failure of the Russian harvest gave the world a grim premonition of what might happen. Warns Hare: "I don't believe that the world's present population is sustainable if there are more than three years like 1972 in a row."
Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend. The University of Wisconsin's Reid A. Bryson and other climatologists suggest that dust and other particles released into the atmosphere as a result of farming and fuel burning may be blocking more and more sunlight from reaching and heating the surface of the earth.
Climatic Balance. Some scientists like Donald Oilman, chief of the National Weather Service's long-range-prediction group, think that the cooling trend may be only temporary. But all agree that vastly more information is needed about the major influences on the earth's climate. Indeed, it is to gain such knowledge that 38 ships and 13 aircraft, carrying scientists from almost 70 nations, are now assembling in the Atlantic and elsewhere for a massive 100-day study of the effects of the tropical seas and atmosphere on worldwide weather. The study itself is only part of an international scientific effort known acronymically as GARP (for Global Atmospheric Research Program).
Whatever the cause of the cooling trend, its effects could be extremely serious, if not catastrophic. Scientists figure that only a 1% decrease in the amount of sunlight hitting the earth's surface could tip the climatic balance, and cool the planet enough to send it sliding down the road to another ice age within only a few hundred years.
The earth's current climate is something of an anomaly; in the past 700,000 years, there have been at least seven major episodes of glaciers spreading over much of the planet. Temperatures have been as high as they are now only about 5% of the time. But there is a peril more immediate than the prospect of another ice age. Even if temperature and rainfall patterns change only slightly in the near future in one or more of the three major grain-exporting countries—the U.S., Canada and Australia —global food stores would be sharply reduced. University of Toronto Climatologist Kenneth Hare, a former president of the Royal Meteorological Society, believes that the continuing drought and the recent failure of the Russian harvest gave the world a grim premonition of what might happen. Warns Hare: "I don't believe that the world's present population is sustainable if there are more than three years like 1972 in a row."
